Related%20passage for Eruvin 57:12
ומאי אולמיה דהאי מהך אילימא משום דקא תני בהך תבלין ותבלין לאו בני אכילה נינהו אטו הכא מי לא קתני חטין ושעורין ולאו בני אכילה נינהו
On what ground, however, is preference given<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'and what is its strength'.');"><sup>36</sup></span> to the one rather than to the other?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., since the Baraitha contains no law that is contradictory to the Mishnah, is it not possible that Rab's statement applied to the former as much as to the latter?');"><sup>37</sup></span> If it be suggested: Because in the Baraitha<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'in that'.');"><sup>38</sup></span> spices were mentioned, and spices are not eatables,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Hence they arc unsuitable for an 'erub, and the statement, 'the same quantities were also applicable to an 'erub' could not, therefore, be applied to them.');"><sup>39</sup></span>
Explore related%20passage for Eruvin 57:12. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.